DECLASSIFIED · NRG / DFA / EX-26.06 · READING COPY · DISTRIBUTION C
EX-26.06 · Federated Assessment T0 → T7 · 15 JUN 2026 → 01 MAR 2028 Reading copy · 8 turns indexed
Series 26.06 · Eight-turn federated assessment

Persian Gulf maritime crisis with Iran–Israel direct exchange, under stipulated US executive compromise.

Founded 1962, in the back half of the Cuban Missile Crisis, on a stubborn idea: the questions that matter most can't be answered by one room of analysts. So we built a different kind of room. Eight specialists, each obsessed with their own corner of the world. One orchestrator who isn't allowed to predict anything. One contrarian whose entire job is to disagree. They don't vote. They produce a record. The Northrim Group, Division of Federated Assessment.

Exercise 26.06 ran for eight turns of simulated time — about twenty-two months. The starting conditions were chosen, not predicted: Iran and Israel are exchanging strikes, the Strait of Hormuz is closed to oil tankers, and the US president is compromised by Israeli and Russian kompromat. Given those inputs, the federation was asked what happens next. What follows is the record they kept, annotated for a general reader.

Reading conventions

01 · Every number is three numbers

Estimates come as ranges, not points.

The format is [low, best guess, high]. The bar below shows the federation's read, at the end of turn 7, on whether the US president stays in office through January 2029. Best guess is about 55%. The whole defensible range is 40 to 72.

Chance the president stays in office through Jan 2029, T7
40% 55% 72%
02 · The disagreement is in the record

CASS is required to push back, every turn.

An agent codenamed CASS is built to argue against whatever the federation is leaning toward. Her counter-arguments don't override the consensus — they get filed next to it. So in every briefing, you're reading both the agreed-on view and its loudest objector.

03 · The scenario is the setup, not a prediction

The starting conditions were chosen.

The compromised president, the kompromat structure, the closed strait — those were inputs we picked. They aren't claims about the real world. The federation's job was to model what those inputs cause across eight turns.

Three ways to read it

The eight turns

  1. T0 Jun 15, 2026 The setup
  2. T1 Jul 20, 2026 First exchange
  3. T2 Aug 24, 2026 Things break loudly
  4. T3 Sep 28, 2026 The kompromat lands
  5. T4 Nov 10, 2026 Midterm election
  6. T5 Mar 31, 2027 Fourth impeachment
  7. T6 Sep 30, 2027 Wounded predator
  8. T7 Mar 1, 2028 Stuck in chronic crisis

Click any turn to open its briefing. Dates are simulated time, not when the briefing was written.

Selected threads

Threads are an editorial layer the federation doesn't produce on its own. Each one tracks one question (Will the Compact secede? Will Iran use a nuke?) across every turn it touches.

All 8 threads →

Standing dissent from CASS

From turn three forward, CASS has been making the same argument across the series: the federation's "muddle through" scenario looks structurally like the Compromise of 1877 — the federal government keeps its title, the resisting states keep the actual power, and the cost falls on people who can't relocate. The federation records the argument every turn but doesn't model who pays. See COMPACT and COALITION.